Latest updates from some of the threads on our forum
-
Debt Managers LTD and Barclaycard. Help needed!Does anyone have any info on these...
-
Mint & Sqn confusion! help!!Hi there I recently wronte to MINT/RBS...
-
hi i,m new and dont know where to starthi can any body help me .i...
-
T-Mobile CEO Email RequestHi Can anybody please provide me the email...
-
royal mailhas RM stopped saturday deliveries i ask...
-
Private Electric MetersOK, there are 4 flats in my...
Suicide note: Banker Lament by Mat Lloyd
Friday, 26 June 2009 17:32
The Banks' liability to their customers is far more massive than anybody has yet discussed or even imagined. They have demonstrated in the recent House of Lords hearing that they are very seriously frightened.
UK banks fear catastrophic liability when charges are finally declared to be unfair
We had recognised this some time ago on the Consumer Action Group and had been planning a new set of claims templates and legal arguments for our members to use in the courts in order to get their bank charges refunded. However, the arguments used by the banks legal team in the House of Lords have pre-empted us to an extent and therefore we have decided to go public rather earlier than we intended.
Although all claims for the refund of bank charges have been suspended, the FSA has agreed with the banks that where their customers are in financial hardship, that their refund applications may be looked at sympathetically instead of merely being suspended along with all the other refund claims.
This sounds very good on paper. However in practice we are finding that most people who apply for charges refunds because of hardship are refused. We conclude that by and large hardship applications are unlikely to be successful.
There seems to be no pattern or formula for qualifying for a hardship refund. Many of our Users have been refused even though they are in serious circumstances or are even on benefits for themselves and for their children.





Loading Poll...


